If you walk a short distance past the racecourse
and under the arches of the 1840s railway viaduct, you encounter a part of
Chester very different to that of ancient walls, picturesque rows and timbered
houses, known as the Old Port
In earlier centuries, the River Dee was a far mightier waterway than it is
today, and large ships could discharge their cargoes at wharves situated immediately
alongside the City Walls.
If you walk down the steps to the racecourse on the Roodee
and grub about
behind a lot of brambles, debris and portable buildings, you will be rewarded
with the sight of the massive stones of the Roman
, where once war gallies tied up and the trading
ships of the empire discharged their cargoes. Although only a few courses
of these stones now show above ground, they extend for at least another 15
feet underground for much of the length of the wall between here and the Watergate
with traces of groin walls running off at right angles.
Until the start of the 14th century, the existing structure of the ancient
walls and towers proved adequate to the port's defence, but, as the silting
of the Dee estuary started to badly affect the depth of water available to
shipping, it was deemed necessary to extend the defences further out into
the river, and as a result, in 1322 the Watertower
Try to imagine the scene as early illustrations show it: of armed men looking
down from this spot to where the Watertower stands solidly in the river with
ships moored to its base, the bustle of soldiers, mariners and merchants going
about their business. 16th and 17th century maps
of Chester show the River Dee approaching close to the Watergate
allowing just enough room for a quay for goods to be loaded and unloaded into
waiting vessels or the carts which would be dragged up the steep incline of
Watergate Street to the markets in the city.
Right: Crane Bank in the 1930s
Over succeeding centuries the river silted further, nautical trade seriously
declined and Chester lost its ancient position as the principal seaport of
Majestic and gay were the vessels adorning
Thy banks, lovely Dee! as I wandered along;
Where I loved to inhale the pure breath of the morning,
And listen with glee to the mariner's song.
How proudly I gaz'd on thy port that was crowded
With barks that were freighted from India's shore;
Nor thought of the time when thy hopes would be clouded,
And commerce and industry bless thee no more!
later, this remarkable
Balloon- was published,
1855. A small section of it is illustrated below.
At the end of the nineteenth century, it was proposed that Chester's revolutionary new electricity generating station should be built in the Hop Pole Paddock- better known to us today as The Kaleyards- much to the distress of many, including the Cathedral authorities, who in October 1893 wrote to the council that it "would be a grievous eyesore and a permanent injury to the city itself if that site is so used... Architecturally, the works would seriously effect the Cathedral which is now such an attractive feature of the city... The Chapter have always been desirous of the Hop Pole Paddock being kept as open space for the benefit of the city at large and they are quite willing to approach the Ecclesiastical Commissioners in order to see whether some substantial step can be taken to place the Paddock in trust for the enjoyment of the citizens".
The Mayor assured the Dean and Chapter that their appeal would "receive the careful consideration of the Council" but, by the following January (1894) they had formerly decided that the thing would be built here anyway, despite objections, and also that "having settled on the site, it was not for them to deal with suggestions for keeping open space." (sounds familiar, doesn't it?)
In March 1894, the Cathedral authorities offered to pay the sum of £1,000 to purchase the Paddock, but their offer was initially rejected, the committee declaring that this was still the best site for the generating station. A mere month later, however, came an abrupt about-turn when the council decided to accept the Cathedral's £1,000 subject to the following conditions, 1. That it never be built upon and be forever kept open and, 2. That the Chapter relinquish theCorporation a strip of land 12 feet wide at the back of Frodsham Street if and whenever the Corporation require it for widening that street".
The electricity generating station was eventually opened in 1897 here in the Old Port instead, where, after a long resident's battle to fight off a developer's bid to demolish it, it (or at least a token part of it) remains with us today, as we will learn shortly...
With the continuing silting of the Dee and the meteoric rise of the Port of Liverpool,
the shipping faded away (although steam coasters continued to visit Crane
Wharf until the 1930s) and the area continued to decline, to the degree that
if you walk around today, it is difficult to imagine the bustle during the
two hundred years or so of the so-called Old Port's
existence. To the sharp-eyed, however, numerous reminders remain, in the form
of weed-covered harbour walls, the 1730s warehouses (currently serving as
the Sea Cadet's HQ) and quayside buildings such as the Harbourmaster's house
illustrated above. The area nontheless maintained- and continues to maintain-
a thriving residential community and many small businesses: garages, engineers,
hire companies and the like occupy the arches of the railway viaduct. Above
their heads thunder the trains travelling from London to Holyhead and the
boats for Ireland, as they have done for 150 years.
Recently, much new building has occured around the Canal Basin and facing
South View Road- much of which was undertaken by housing associations to provide
new social- and young people's accomodation. This is to be followed by more
new houses on cleared land between Tower Road and South View Road.
So far so good. The area's restoration has been long overdue and the new,
low-rent homes were badly needed. Unfortunately, proposals for the second
phase of the Old Port redevelopment- involving the needless demolition of
the handsome Victorian Electric Lighting Company Building (illustrated right) and its replacement by a series of ugly, overlarge and
inappropriate office blocks- 'artist's impression's' of which may seen below- received, as we shall see,
an extremely hostile reception by the people of Chester.
The Electric Light Building was Chester's first electric
generating station, designed by I. Matthews Jones and built by a forward-looking Corporation in
New Crane Street in 1896, under the auspices of the eminent Professor Kennedy
and overseen by no less than the world famous scientist Lord Kelvin. The men
responsible for the distribution of the electricity were the engineers
F. Thursfield (until 1904) and S. E. Britton (until 1946)- both, sadly, rarely remembered today.
The three original generators have long disappeared, but in recent years the attractive
office building of the former power station had been occupied by local electricity
provider Manweb. With the ending of their lease, thought had to be
given to the future of the building- considered by many to be an eloquent
symbol of our region's industrial heritage and as such, eminently worthy of
preservation. Architect Francis Graves presented
the case in the Sunday Times for its conversion to a possible exhibition
or 'heritage' centre and restaurant. Not only did Graves recommend retaining
the building for its appearance but noted it as a "central landmark" suitable
for public use, etc. There was, after all, ample space for office development
across the road on the land recently vacated by the gasworks, together with
more houses- which may do something to lift the threat of development in other
parts of the city, such as the much-valued allotments on Cheyney Road and
the Blacon Meadows, to name just two.
Chairman of the Chester Civic Trust, Stephen Langtree, wrote in the Trust's newsletter that "no economically
viable new use could be found for the building" and the council therefore
decided to hold an architectural competition in conjunction with Wilmslow-based
developers FT Patten- with Langtree himself as
one of the judges- to "see whether a scheme might emerge which would enhance
the area and justify the loss of the Victorian building". These experts plumped
for a design by architects Mills Beaumont Leavey Channon which, believe it or not, "evoked the maritime context through the use of glass cladding, lighting
and external water features." Consequently, we're told, "some of the more
exuberant aspects" of the design were subsequently done away with during the
planning permission process- leaving us with the delightful escapees from
Milton Keynes illustrated here and below...
continued, "I know some of you are deeply unhappy about the loss of the old
Lighting Company Building. It is undoubtedly one of important local interest but is not, we believe, of any great architectural merit. Retaining the facade might have been an option, but part of it straddles a
large old sewer over which no new construction would have been allowed". This
was a crude, easily-exposed untruth, which, as the apparent major reason for
demolition, somehow continued to be repeated- most recently by City Council
Head of Planning Andrew Farrall in the Chester Standard of 6th
August 1998. Curiously, both Welsh Water and the city council's
own engineers said there was absolutely nothing wrong with the Victorian sewer and no remedial action would be necessary should
the building be retained. Only in the event of its replacement would a three-metre
wide 'exclusion zone' come into operation. And even if there were a problem,
as is pointed out in a letter below, the repair
and replacement of sewers, however large, has been going on for some time
now. The process can be tricky, but is hardly high tech, and certainly does
not require the demolition of existing buildings- otherwise there would be
a lot of gaps in most city centres!
In the words of Councillor Steve Davies (one of the very few elected
representatives to speak up against these absurd proposals)- "I believe the
developers don't want this building, so we are looking at ways to get rid
of it". He felt that the developers- doubtless backed up by elements within
the city council and Civic Trust- did not want to retain the building because
it did not fit in with their bright new 'high tech' image, and would therefore not attract
the 'right sort' of company to occupy it- "This is a historic city, so why
should we welcome developers who want to put up modern offices you could see
in Milton Keynes? The people of Chester placed their trust in us when they
voted for us. Let us not betray that trust or we will earn the same contempt
from future generations that we have for those who pulled down the old Market frontage".
In sharp contrast, back to Stephen Langtree: "Retaining a partial facade was,
in the opinion of the Civic Trust Council, a less satisfactory solution than
making way for a new group of three buildings which will untie the space,
providing a 'gateway' to the city and be a commercially stimulating centrepiece
for the revival of the area".
In a similar vein, in the course of reviewing 15 years of conservation
'progress' since European Architectural Heritage Year in 1975, one David
Pearce wrote, "Now the emphasis is on preservation and conservation of
old buildings, and their intelligent adaptation to new uses. And in a bizarre
reversal, old buildings are now too often assumed to have greater intrinsic
merit than any new design". In other words, as this same individual remarked
when adressing Chester Civic Trust in 1989, "We cannot, and must not, try
to keep everything".
Music, we're sure, to the ears of the planners and developers...